What Should the Kentucky Wildcats Do With Billy G

There is a lot of speculation as to whether the University of Kentucky should send head coach Billy Gillispie packing or give him more time to rebuild the program. Living in Lexington, I get to hear from both sides of the fence, but the "Fire Billy G" contingent seems to be yelling louder. As with all good coaching decisions, there are two sides to this argument.

I can totally understand why the large majority of Cats fans want the coach sacked. This is the tradition that Rupp built. UK has won more games than any other Division I team in history. Kentucky is second in NCAA tournament titles with seven. This is, for crying out loud, the team that ESPN loves to cover just so they can get a good camera shot of Ashley Judd. Look at what Billy has done to the Big Blue Nation.

For the first time in almost 20 years, Kentucky is not in the NCAA field of 65. They got bounced from the NIT in the quarterfinals, and look over matched doing it. They finished fourth in the SEC East, and it wasn't a surprise. Let me say that again...FOURTH! They have lost to Gardner Webb and VMI at home in the hallowed Rupp Arena since Billy G took over. This team has played all year with no direction, no consistency, little passion, and no help for potential NBA prospects Jodie Meeks and Patrick Patterson.

And if all the on the court problems are not enough, Coach Gillispie seems to not be the greatest off the court representative the school has ever seen. His DUI arrest in Texas is well documented. There are tons of rumors of his drinking escapades running rampant in Lexington, including being kicked out of hotels and being banned from some of the city's finest restaurants. He has also had several altercations with the media. He has bashed ESPN sideline reporters for "dumb questions" and has displayed a horrible attitude with some of the local media that has not gone over very well with the fan base.

But with all that being said, firing the second year man may not be the wisest course of action for the University or for the development of the program. He currently would have to be paid a six million dollar buyout. With UK raising tuition, again, this payment to get rid of an athletics coach could be a public relations nightmare. Also, with the problems Athletic Director Mitch Barnhart had trying to hire a coach after Tubby Smith left, going through another coaching search may further tarnish the reputation of the school more than a couple of struggling years on the court.

The fans here were so quick to run Tubby Smith out of town because he couldn't recruit, his style of defensive play was boring, and didn't get the Cats back to the Final Four in the last ten years he was in Lexington. Even though Tubby was averaging 26 wins a year, that was not good enough. Now Gillispie has come in a recruited some good talent, including the aforementioned Patterson. With the verbal commitments of prep star Daniel Orton, Kentucky high school product Jon Hood, and Texas prep point guard G.J. Vilarino, this young team looks like they are starting to get the pieces necessary to reestablish Kentucky as an elite program like the fans demand. Gillispie needs time to bring in more of his own players and graduate what was left by Smith. If the fans hated Tubby's recruiting classes so badly, why can't they give Billy G time to get rid of what was left behind and see what he can do once the roster is full of "his" guys.

Every team goes through ups and downs. The beloved Rick Pitino has been NIT bound twice since he took over at Louisville. The man that UK fans wanted initially, Flordia's Billy Donovan, just got knocked out of his second straight NIT. Even Duke, North Carolina, and UCLA have had down years. It happens to all the great programs, but it is hard to blame a guy that has only been here two years. Additionally, the proverbial cupboard was bare of any significant talent when he got here, except for Meeks.

I agree that Billy Gillispie has some image problems, the team turns the ball over too much, and the lack of coach's flexibility with his offensive and defensive schemes are enough for Big Blue Nation to call for his head. I also think he deserves two to three more years to bring back the luster to this once shining beacon of basketball programs with his recruiting classes and his seemingly endless desire to tackle this challenge. Either way, Kentucky is definitely in for a trying off season, and it will not be boring.

5 Things We Learned From UFC96: Jackson vs Jardine

Hello Ric's Rants followers. I have made my first attempt a creating a slide show blog. I was unable to do it here on this site, so please check it out on my Bleacher Report account. If you cannot click on the link below, please copy and paste into the address bar of your browser. Even if you are not a MMA or UFC fan, please check this one out and let me know how you think I did. Thanks.

Ric


http://bleacherreport.com/articles/136141-5-things-we-learned-fron-ufc-96-jackson-vs-jardine

Stanley Cup Finals: How The NHL Is Slashing Itself In The Foot...Again!!!

It was announced that games one and two of the Stanley Cup Finals will be aired on NBC this year. Games three and four will be shown on Versus, and the final three games of the series, if necessary, will be back on NBC. While this may seem like a good idea at first glance, there are still problems with the NHL and the way they are marketing the league.

With the first two games being on NBC, this will give the NHL a chance at a bigger weekend audience. If past numbers tell us anything, it is that this move really won't make a huge difference. Hockey fans would rather see a clinching game than the series opener. While NBC reaches 112 million households, Versus only reaches 75 million households, which will greatly deprive a large portion of the viewing public from seeing a potential Cup clinching win in a four game sweep.

Over the last ten years, either ESPN or Versus has shown the first two games of the Finals. The remaining games of the series were shown on larger viewership networks. This still is not the greatest option either. It can be difficult for the casual fan to understand the dynamic of the two teams and how the flow of the series has gone not having seen the first two games. This is the equivalent of watching a three hour dramatic movie, but just getting to see the last 75 minutes.

The NHL has two true showcases every year, the All Star Game and the Stanley Cup Finals. Somehow they seem to screw up both opportunities to gain fans. This can be seen in the viewership totals and the scheduling of the televised games. This does not even include the poor attempt at gaining an audience with the nationally televised regular season games. The commissioner's office has done way more harm than good in their decisions on how to air this great sport.

If the NHL wants to grow in the public eye, the Stanley Cup Finals has to be readily available to be seen by as many viewers as possible. Putting some of the games on a network that only 65% of Americans have available is not the smartest move. Whether fans cannot see the first two games or a potential clinching game, both scenarios are bad for the league. This just looks like another example of Commissioner Gary Bettman over thinking a horrible idea.